On 19 Feb 2014, at 13:30, Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andy Stormont <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The IPS metadeta isn?t really that useful to non-IPS distributions but I?m >> not sure removing it is a good idea. Instead I?d rather see the SVR4 data >> reintegrated if it?s going to see some use and somebody cares enough to >> maintain it. > > This is what I did in late 2010 and early 2011. > > Svr4 package meta data is present and maintained on SchilliX-ON. > Feel free to take it. I’d love to see an SVR4 distro that was actually supported by upstream illumos but I won’t be the one to make it happen. Do you not have any desire to move to an illumos-gate base? > > Even though I have no use for the IPS meta data, I did maintain it so far... > > Jörg > > -- > EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin > [email protected] (uni) > [email protected] (work) Blog: > http://schily.blogspot.com/ > URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
