Hi -
Just so there is no confusion.
(1) The ODFToolkit project had one small Confluence Wiki at the ASF. The pages
are not very interesting.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ODFTOOLKIT/Index
The MediaWiki is managed by the Apache OpenOffice PMC at
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/ODF_Toolkit
This content is separate for historical reasons. Any copying of content
depends on the license.
Please contact [email protected] regarding the MWiki content.
(2) Since the Incubator has retired the ODF Toolkit project no special
formalities are required.
If the TDF wants to make an official proposal then reach out to
[email protected]
In general the ASF has no desire to hold branding for any efforts that
have failed incubation and have never become a top level project.
If you want explicit confirmation of this then email
[email protected]
Regards,
Dave
> On Nov 30, 2018, at 1:58 AM, Michael Stahl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> hi Dennis,
>
> On 28.11.18 12:49, Dennis Roczek wrote:
>> On 28.11.2018 11:00, Michael Meeks wrote:
>>>> 2. the web site, in SVN (will also be changed to read-only):
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/site/
>>>>
>>>> the SVN repo contains some MarkDown files that are converted to
>>> ...
>>>> presumably there should be a way to preserve the (relatively small
>>>> and simple) content of the repo to either Wiki markup, or something
>>>> that some other MarkDown-to-HTML tool can understand; volunteers are
>>>> certainly welcome to help with this.
>
>>> Sounds sensible - what is the scale of the problem: how many lines/tags
>>> of markdown ?
>
> so most of the SVN repo is binary releases, and generated JavaDoc
> documentation.
>
> there are 10570 lines worth of files with ".mdtext" suffix.
>
>> there are converters (see
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9824489/any-markdown-to-wikimarkup-converter-available
>> ) so especially pandoc.
>
> sounds promising.
>
>> I offer the help for the MWiki migration. ;-)
>
> thanks for the offer, much appreciated :)
>
> from my point of view, having most of the site in Wiki would be easiest to
> maintain, except perhaps for the release download page.
>
> regards,
> michael
