I think git is a good idea, you might even be able to ask for a gitbox repo which resides on github, either gitbox or not, it would allow users to push to a github repo alongside the git.wip repo(if its non gitbox) which increases the chances of 3rd party contributions and exposure for non ASF people.
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Svante Schubert <[email protected] > wrote: > Hello Ian, > > Actually, I do not care much if the website remains on SVN. > But perhaps it makes sense to have one tooling for everything in a project > and not a mixed set. > I was just wondering how other projects handling their website. > > Cheers, > Svante > > 2017-09-16 12:27 GMT+02:00 Ian C <[email protected]>: > > > Hi Svante, are you proposing parallel SVN and GIT repositories? > > > > I have no real preference, I like GIT and would be happy to see it there. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ian > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Svante Schubert < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > This is the last project of mine that is using subversion and it would > > help > > > me a lot (and all others I have talked to) if we could transform the > > source > > > repository from svn to git. > > > Especially, as I a plan to work on a feature branch (the ODF changes > > > features), which works best to when working with git. > > > > > > If no one else would be able to do it, I would do the work. :) > > > > > > Any feedback is welcome! > > > Svante > > > ᐧ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Ian C > > >
