Thank you Michael, I've opened PR for each, the PRs are linked in the individual issues.
S pozdravem, *Filip Skokan* On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 at 05:29, Michael Fraser <mj.fraser99= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, I’ve given the Additional Hash Algorithms for OAuth 2.0 PKCE and > Proof-of-Possession draft a review: > > Adding some additional definitions for terms used (such as BASE64URL, > SHA-512, etc) to align with prior text would be useful. > - Raised https://github.com/panva/draft-oauth-additional-hashes/issues/3 > - The issue includes some suggested text to align the definitions with > those defined in PKCE > > Some concerns jumped out at me around the behaviour of the ath_methods > parameter and its relationship to the > dpop_access_token_hash_methods_supported claim. Specifically their > alignment and the optionality of the ath_methods parameter. I’ve detailed > these in the following issues: > - https://github.com/panva/draft-oauth-additional-hashes/issues/4 > - https://github.com/panva/draft-oauth-additional-hashes/issues/5 > > Also added support to > https://github.com/panva/draft-oauth-additional-hashes/issues/2 in favour > of allowing co-existence for migration purposes > > Aside from the above, I am happy with the document. > > Thanks, > Michael Fraser > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
