This is a long known error in the tooling that creates the HTMLized versions of 
older specs, and is not specific to this specification. I believe this errata 
should be rejected as there is no change to the underlying text that would fix 
the tooling.

 — Justin

> On Aug 27, 2025, at 3:32 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7591,
> "OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8557
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Atul Tulshibagwale <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> As required by [Section 
> 2](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7591#section-2) of OAuth 2.0 
> [[RFC6749](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749)]
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> As required by [Section 
> 2](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2) of OAuth 2.0 
> [[RFC6749](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749)]
> 
> Notes
> -----
> In section 2 of RFC 7591, the links to sections 2, 2.1, 2.3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 
> 4.4, 4.5, and 6 are incorrectly pointing to sections within RFC7591. They 
> should be pointing to the corresponding sections in RFC 6749. The link to 
> sections 2.3.1, 4.3, and 4.4 are actually broken, because those sections do 
> not exist in RFC 7591
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7591 (draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-30)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol
> Publication Date    : July 2015
> Author(s)           : J. Richer, Ed., M. Jones, J. Bradley, M. Machulak, P. 
> Hunt
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to