On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 11:33 AM Steffen Schwalm <[email protected]> wrote:
> I strongly oppose against moving forward the specification as Issues still > open. > > > > 1. There´s no documented decision on the well-known x509 issue – > beside the wishes of the authors > > Having seen and participated in discussion of the issue on the mailing list, at "unofficial" events with WG participants, and at official events with WG participants - the decision was very clearly based on the wishes of the rough consensus of the WG participants. Speaking as an individual, of course. > 1. > 2. Still wait for information from chairs where and how to solve issue > when not in TokenStatusList > 3. Means TokenStatusList contains privacy issue in case used for > Attestatiosn of attributes in eIDAS > > > > > > *Von:* Kristina Yasuda <[email protected]> > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 2. April 2025 00:22 > *An:* ANTHONY NADALIN <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; oauth <[email protected]> > *Betreff:* [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List > > > > *Caution:* This email originated from outside of the organization. > Despite an upstream security check of attachments and links by Microsoft > Defender for Office, a residual risk always remains. Only open attachments > and links from known and trusted senders. > > I support moving this specification forward. It is a crucial building > block for lifecycle management of different tokens/credentials. > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:42 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <[email protected]> > wrote: > > support this moving forward as we need this in ISO > > > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] <torsten= > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 1, 2025 11:38:22 AM > *To:* oauth <[email protected]>; Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List > > > > Hi, > > I support moving this spec forward. > > > > best regards, > > Torsten. > > Am 24. März 2025, 13:41 +0100 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef < > [email protected]>: > > All, > > This is a *second WG Last Call* for the *Token Status List* document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list/ > > Please, review this document and reply on the mailing list if you have any > comments or concerns, by *April 7th*. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
