On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 5:31 PM, CJ Carey <perimosocord...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Ralf; coupling these changes to sparse is a bad idea. > > I think that scipy.sparse will be an important consideration during the > deprecation process, though, perhaps as an indicator of how painful the > transition might be for third party code. > > I'm +1 for splitting matrices out into a standalone package. > Decoupled or not, sparse still needs to be dealt with. What is the plan? <snip> Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
