On Di, 2016-09-06 at 13:59 -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk wrote: > In a separate message, since perhaps a little less looney: yet > another > option would be work by analogy with np.ix_ and define pre-dispatch > index preparation routines np.ox_ and np.vx_ (say), which would be > used as in: > ``` > array[np.ox_[:, 10]] -- or -- array[np.vx_[:, 10]] > ``` > This could work if those functions each return something appropriate > for the legacy indexer, or, if that is not possible, a specific > subclass of tuple as a marker that gets interpreted further up.
Sure, it would be a solution, but not sure it is any better implementation wise then just passing an extra argument. As for the syntax for plain arrays, I am not convinced to be honest. - Sebastian > In the end, though, probably also too complicated. It may remain best > to simply implement the new methods instead and keep it at that! > > -- Marten > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
