On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:24:15 +0200, mail kirjoitti: > [clip] >> Since it is run by the community, perhaps it's not a bad idea to >> encourage people to share their examples. > > I would perhaps rather encourage people to improve the "Numpy User Guide" > or the main documentation. Of course, working on that requires a somewhat > different level of committment than editing what's essentially > Stackexchange-provided wiki (where content gets relicensed with > attribution clauses where you have to reference stackexchange and not the > original author directly).
The way it looks right now, it is more of an example collection by topic, similar to the old scipy wiki examples for numpy. http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/python/196/comprehensions#t=201607212153155953853 It doesn't look like it will be a substitute for proper API documentation, docstrings with numpy standard. Longer examples or recipes on stackoverflow also have the problem that code doesn't have a different license and falls under the documentation license. So, I don't think it will become a substitute for good notebook or blog post examples either. (license is the usual one way street, they copy, we cannot copy back under our license) Josef > > -- > Pauli Virtanen > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
