On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Robert Kern <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think permission from Intel is the blocking issue for putting > these binaries up on PyPI. Even with Intel's permission, we would be > putting up proprietary binaries on a page that is explicitly claiming that > the files linked therein are BSD-licensed. The binaries could not be > redistributed with any GPLed module, say, pygsl. > > We could host them on numpy.org on their own page that clearly explained > the license of those files, but I think PyPI is out. > > Can't PyPi re-direct -- so they can actualy be hosted somewhere else, but "pip install numpy" would still work? IIUC, The Intel libs have the great advantage of run-time selection of hardware specific code -- yes? So they would both work and give high performance on most machines (all?). Much as I am a fan of open source, there doesn't appear to be anything as good out there. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [email protected]
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
