Roland Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > I think the best way to solve this issue to not use a state at all. It is > fast, reproducible even in parallel (if wanted), and doesn't suffer from > the shared issue. Would be nice if numpy provided such a stateless RNG as > implemented in Random123: www.deshawresearch.com/resources_random123.html > > Roland
That is interesting. I think np.random needs to be refactored, so it can accept a pluggable rng - then we could switch the underlying rng. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
