On 06-Jan-15 7:31 AM, Sturla Molden
wrote:
Sturla,On 06/01/15 02:08, cjw wrote:This is not a comment on any present matrix support, but deals with the matrix class, which existed back when Todd Miller of the Space Telescope Group supported numpy.Matrix is a sub-class of ndarray.Since this Matrix class is (more or less) deprecated and its use discouraged, I think it should just be left as it is. Sturla My recollection, from discussions, at the time of the introduction of the @ operator, was that there was no intention to disturb the existing Matrix class. I see the matrix as a long recognized mathematical entity. On the other hand, the array is a very useful computational construct, used in a number of computer languages. Since matrices are now part of some high school curricula, I urge that they be treated appropriately in Numpy. Further, I suggest that consideration be given to establishing V and VT sub-classes, to cover vectors and transposed vectors. Regards, Colin W. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion |
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion