Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > The polite, welcoming > response to someone coming along with a straightforward, > obviously-correct contribution to our SWIG capabilities is "Thank > you!", not "perhaps you overestimate the number of NumPy users who use > Swig".
That was a response to something else. As to why this issue with NumPy and Swig has not been solved before, the OP suggested he might have overestimated the number of NumPy users who also use std::complex in C++. Hence my answer he did not (it is arguably not that uncommon), but maybe they don't use Swig. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
