Sebastian Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it is much more complicated and incompatible with naive ufuncs if > you want your memory access to be optimized. And optimizing that is very > much worth it speed wise...
Why? Couldn't we just copy the data chunk-wise to a temporary buffer of say 2**13 numbers and then reduce that? I don't see why we need another iterator for that. Sturla _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
