Hi, On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Sturla Molden <[email protected]> wrote: > Matthew Brett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Julian - do you have any opinion on using gotoBLAS instead of OpenBLAS >> for the Windows binaries? > > That is basically OpenBLAS too, except with more bugs and no AVX support.
I know that OpenBLAS is a fork of gotoBLAS2, but you said in another thread that gotoBLAS2 was 'rock-solid'. If the bugs in gotoBLAS2 do not in practice arise for default Windows builds, then it could be a good option until OpenBLAS is more mature. Put another way - does anyone know what bugs in gotoBLAS2 do arise for Windows / Intel builds? Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
