On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Travis Oliphant <tra...@continuum.io> wrote:
> Hey Sebastien, > > I didn't mean to imply that you would need to necessarily work on it. > But the work Jay has done could use review. > > There are also conversations to have about what to do to resolve the > ambiguity that led to the current behavior. > > Thank you or all the great work on the indexing code paths. > > Is their a roadmap for 1.9? > We don't have a roadmap, but the indexing code is something I'd like to see go in. Are you asking in relation to Jay's work? I have a loose idea to branch 1.9 sometime in late April/May. The other important bit to fix up, which isn't started yet, is datetime. <snip> Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
