On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 17:19 +0000, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Charles Waldman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Can you post the raw data?  It seems like there are just a couple of "bad"
> > sizes, I'd like to know more precisely what these are.
> >
> 
> Indeed. Several of the sizes generated by logspace(2, 7, 25) are prime
> numbers, where numpy.fft is actually O(N^2) and not the usual O(NLogN).
Ok I thought the fft is always O(N log N). But it makes sense that this
only works if the input-size factorizes well. Thanks for clearing this
up.

best Max
> 
> There is unfortunately no freely (aka BSD-like licensed) available fft
> implementation that works for prime (or 'close to prime') numbers, and
> implementing one that is precise enough is not trivial (look at Bernstein
> transform for more details).
> 
> David
> 
> >
> > It's typical for FFT to perform better at a sample size that is a power of
> > 2, and algorithms like FFTW take advantage of factoring the size, and
> > "sizes that are products of small factors are transformed most efficiently."
> >
> >   - Charles
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Max Linke <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I noticed some strange scaling behavior of the fft runtime. For most
> >> array-sizes the fft will be calculated in a couple of seconds, even for
> >> very large ones. But there are some array sizes in between where it will
> >> take about ~20 min (e.g. 400000). This is really odd for me because an
> >> array with 10 million entries is transformed in ~2s. Is this typical for
> >> numpy?
> >>
> >> I attached a plot and an ipynb to reproduce and illustrate it.
> >>
> >> best Max
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to