On 2 Oct 2013 19:14, "Benjamin Root" <[email protected]> wrote: > > And it is logically consistent, I think. a[nanargmax(a)] == nanmax(a) (ignoring the silly detail that you can't do an equality on nans).
Why do you call this a silly detail? It seems to me a fundamental flaw to this approach. Stéfan
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
