On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Juan Luis Cano <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm having some problems to properly build a module written in Fortran > 90 using numpy.distutils. It only contains one subroutine, but: > > * If I write a .f90 file with the single subroutine (no module .. > contains), then f2py tries to compile it using a f77 compiler, and > that's not what I want. > * If I put it inside a module definition, then at the final > compilation stage modulef2pywrapper.c is missing the corresponding > .mod file and I have to make the build fail, then copy the .mod from > the temp directory and rebuild. Weird. > > On the other hand, with the second approach f2py creates a unnecessary > level of nesting in the corresponding python module and I don't feel > quite ok with that. > > What is the right way to do this? I find the documentation on > numpy.distutils a bit lacking, I almost always find the solution by > trial and error. I can push the code, it's a short file (part of the > rewrite of odeint I'm doing in SciPy). > > Regards > > Juan Luis Cano > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > You should be able to specify the compiler when invoking f2py, something like: f2py --fcompiler=$COMPILER -m $MODULE_NAME -c $SOURCE_FILE Kyle
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
