On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM, KACVINSKY Tom <[email protected]>wrote:
> llvm-gcc. You have to specify the right options which I can look up > tomorrow when I'm back in the office. We don't invoke gcc directly, we use > xcrun. > > On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:31, "David Cournapeau" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:20 PM, KACVINSKY Tom <[email protected]>wrote: > >> You can use the 10.6 SDK on 10.8. At least we do. >> > > With which compiler ? > > David > >> >> Tom >> >> On Aug 20, 2013, at 18:17, "David Cournapeau" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ralf Gommers <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Building binaries for releases is currently quite complex and >>> time-consuming. For OS X we need two different machines, because we still >>> provide binaries for OS X 10.5 and PPC machines. I propose to not do this >>> anymore. It doesn't mean we completely drop support for 10.5 and PPC, just >>> that we don't produce binaries. PPC was phased out in 2006 and OS X 10.6 >>> came out in 2009, so there can't be a lot of demand for it (and the >>> download stats at >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/1.7.1/ confirm this). >>> >>> Furthermore I propose to not provide 2.6 binaries anymore. Downloads >>> of 2.6 OS X binaries were <5% of the 2.7 ones. We did the same with 2.4 for >>> a long time - support it but no binaries. >>> >>> So what we'd have left at the moment is only the 64-bit/32-bit >>> universal binary for 10.6 and up. What we finally need to add is 3.x OS X >>> binaries. We can make an attempt to build these on 10.8 - since we have >>> access to a hosted 10.8 Mac Mini it would allow all devs to easily do a >>> release (leaving aside the Windows issue). If anyone has tried the 10.6 SDK >>> on 10.8 and knows if it actually works, that would be helpful. >>> >> >> I am not sure one can use 10.6 SDK on 10.8 ? I am actually looking into >> those issues for our mac support at Enthought >> >> Are you here for euroscipy ? >> >> David >> >>> >>> Any concerns, objections? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ralf >>> >>> P.S. the same proposal applies of course also to scipy >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the >> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or >> privileged. >> >> If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in >> error, >> >> (i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it, >> >> (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this >> email and all attachments, >> >> (iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or >> responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email. >> >> For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential and/or > privileged. > > If you are not one of the named recipients or have received this email in > error, > > (i) you should not read, disclose, or copy it, > > (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and delete this > email and all attachments, > > (iii) Dassault Systemes does not accept or assume any liability or > responsibility for any use of or reliance on this email. > > For other languages, go to http://www.3ds.com/terms/email-disclaimer > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > This would be an appropriate time I suppose to say I am attempting to build numpy, scipy and matplotlib on 10.9. NDA of course prohibits me (unfortunately) from really discussing things but safe to say I would support "moving on". There are a multitude of issues that would be resolved by dropping support for PPC (build complexity) and supporting SDKs versions > 10.6. Kyle
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
