On 2013/06/12 8:13 AM, Warren Weckesser wrote: > That's why I suggested 'filledwith' (add the underscore if you like). > This also allows a corresponding masked implementation, 'ma.filledwith', > without clobbering the existing 'ma.filled'.
Consensus on np.filled? absolutely not, you do not have a consensus. np.filledwith or filled_with: fine with me, maybe even with everyone--let's see. I would prefer the underscore version. Eric _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
