On Wed, 01 May 2013, Sebastian Berg wrote: > > btw -- is there something like panda's vbench for numpy? i.e. where > > it would be possible to track/visualize such performance > > improvements/hits?
> Sorry if it seemed harsh, but only skimmed mails and it seemed a bit > like the an obvious piece was missing... There are no benchmark tests I > am aware of. You can try: > a = np.random.random((1000, 1000)) > and then time a.sum(1) and a.sum(0), on 1.7. the fast axis (1), is only > slightly faster then the sum over the slow axis. On earlier numpy > versions you will probably see something like half the speed for the > slow axis (only got ancient or 1.7 numpy right now, so reluctant to give > exact timings). FWIW -- just as a cruel first attempt look at http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/numpy-vbench-20130506/vb_vb_reduce.html why float16 case is so special? I have pushed this really coarse setup (based on some elderly copy of pandas' vbench) to https://github.com/yarikoptic/numpy-vbench if you care to tune it up/extend and then I could fire it up again on that box (which doesn't do anything else ATM AFAIK). Since majority of time is spent actually building it (did it with ccache though) it would be neat if you come up with more of benchmarks to run which you might think could be interesting/important. -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
