On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 5:25 PM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:44 AM, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Charles R Harris > >> > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi All, > >> >> > >> >> In the continuing proposal for cleanups, note that we currently > support > >> >> three (3!) build systems, distutils, scons, and bento. That's a bit > >> >> much to > >> >> maintain when contemplating changes, and scons and bento both have > >> >> external > >> >> dependencies. Can we dispense with any of these? Thoughts? > >> > > >> > > >> > Numscons is the only one that can be dropped. I'm still using it > >> > regularly, > >> > but the few things it does better than bento can be easily improved in > >> > bento. So if removing numscons support from master saves some > developer > >> > hours, +1 from me. > >> > >> I think numscons was already scheduled to be dropped in 1.7 (and next > >> version of scipy as well) ? I am certainly in favor of dropping it as > >> well. > > > > > > Is bento documented anywhere or can you commit to keeping it working for > > numpy? > > Both. Doc: http://bento.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ and tests > (https://travis-ci.org/cournape/Bento) are continuously run/updated. > That's bento's own test suite only - we should add a numpy build with Bento for at least Python 2.7 to the numpy Travis config. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
