Sorry, I'm away from the lab and did not have a chance to test is yet. I will do next week.
Nicolas On Oct 11, 2012, at 15:48 , Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Nicolas Rougier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I missed the original post but I personally find this addition especially >> useful for my work in computational neuroscience. >> >> I did something vaguely similar in a small framework (http://dana.loria.fr/, >> you can look more specifically at http://dana.loria.fr/doc/connection.html >> for details). Examples are available from: http://dana.loria.fr/examples.html >> >> The actual computation can be made in several ways depending on the >> properties of the kernel but the idea is to compute an array "K" such that >> given an array "A" and a kernel "k", A*K holds the expected result. This >> also work with sparse array for example when the kernel is very small. I >> suspect the PR will be quite efficient compared to what I did. > > Would the current PR be useful to you if merged as-is? A common > pitfall with these sorts of contributions is that we realize only > after merging it that there is some tiny detail of the API that makes > it not-quite-usable for some people with related problems, so it'd be > awesome if you could take a closer look. > > -n > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
