On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Benjamin Root <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Travis Oliphant <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Sep 21, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> An issue I keep running into is that packages use: >> install_requires = ["numpy"] >> or >> install_requires = ['numpy >= 1.6'] >> >> in their setup.py. This simply doesn't work a lot of the time. I actually >> filed a bug against patsy for that ( >> https://github.com/pydata/patsy/issues/5), but Nathaniel is right that >> it would be better to bring it up on this list. >> >> The problem is that if you use pip, it doesn't detect numpy (may work >> better if you had installed numpy with setuptools) and tries to >> automatically install or upgrade numpy. That won't work if users don't have >> the right compiler. Just as bad would be that it does work, and the user >> didn't want to upgrade for whatever reason. >> >> This isn't just my problem; at Wes' pandas tutorial at EuroScipy I saw >> other people have the exact same problem. My recommendation would be to not >> use install_requires for numpy, but simply do something like this in >> setup.py: >> >> try: >> import numpy >> except ImportError: >> raise ImportError("my_package requires numpy") >> >> or >> >> try: >> from numpy.version import short_version as npversion >> except ImportError: >> raise ImportError("my_package requires numpy") >> if npversion < '1.6': >> raise ImportError("Numpy version is %s; required is version >= >> 1.6" % npversion) >> >> Any objections, better ideas? Is there a good place to put it in the >> numpy docs somewhere? >> >> >> I agree. I would recommend against using install requires. >> >> -Travis >> >> >> > Why? I have personally never had an issue with this. The only way I > could imagine that this wouldn't work is if numpy was installed via some > other means and there wasn't an entry in the easy-install.pth (or whatever > equivalent pip uses). > Eh, just installing numpy with "python setup.py install" uses plain distutils, not setuptools. So there indeed isn't an entry in easy-install.pth. Which some consider a feature:) > If pip is having a problem detecting numpy, then that is a bug that needs > fixing somewhere. > Sure. But who's going to do that? > As for packages getting updated unintentionally, easy_install and pip both > require an argument to upgrade any existing packages (I think -U), so I am > not sure how you are running into such a situation. > No, if the version detection fails pip will happily "upgrade" my 1.8.0-dev to 1.6.2. > I have found install_requires to be a powerful feature in my setup.py > scripts, and I have seen no reason to discourage it. Perhaps I am the only > one? > I'm sure you're not the only one. But it's still severely broken. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
