On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Charles R Harris <[email protected] > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Charles R Harris < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Given the amount of new stuff coming in 1.7 and the slip in it's >>> schedule, I wonder if it would be worth putting out a 1.6.2 release with >>> fixes for einsum, ticket 1578, perhaps some others. My reasoning is that >>> the fall releases of Fedora, Ubuntu are likely to still use 1.6 and they >>> might as well use a somewhat fixed up version. The downside is located and >>> backporting fixes is likely to be a fair amount of work. A 1.7 release >>> would be preferable, but I'm not sure when we can make that happen. >>> >> >> Travis still sounded hopeful of being able to resolve the 1.7 issues >> relatively soon. On the other hand, even if that's done in one month we'll >> still miss Debian stable and a 1.6.2 release won't be *that* much work. >> >> Let's go for it I would say. >> >> Aiming for a RC on May 2nd and final release on May 16th would work for >> me. >> >> > I count 280 BUG commits since 1.6.1, so we are going to need to thin those > out. > > Backported einsum fixes. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
