Den 18. feb. 2012 kl. 05:23 skrev Jason Grout <[email protected]>:
> On 2/17/12 10:10 PM, Sturla Molden wrote: > >> Sure. They just keep adding features for the expence of stability. No >> focus or sence of direction. Focus on a small feature set, make it >> right, then don't add to it. That is the root of the successes of C, >> Python and Java. NumPy needs a stabile compiler that don't make >> mistakes everywhere. You cannot trust that to Cython. > > Again, if you have specific examples of stability being sacrificed, I'm > sure the Cython list would like to hear about it. Your statements, > as-is, are raising huge FUD flags for me. > Cython is still 0.16, it is still unfinished. We cannot base NumPy on an unfinished compiler. Sturla _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
