On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Charles R Harris <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Travis Oliphant <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I like the idea. Is there resolution to the NA question? >> > > No, people still disagree and are likely to do so for years to come with > no end in sight. That's why the preview label. > > Agreed that it's not resolved, but I think we at least got to the point where we agreed not to back out the complete missing data additions. So if we clearly say that we keep all options for future API changes open (=preview label), I don't think that the issue should hold up a numpy release indefinitely. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
