On 03.12.2011, at 6:47PM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
> Ah sorry, I hadn't read carefully enough what you were trying to achieve. I
> think the double repeat solution looks like your best option then.
Considering that it is a lot shorter than fixing the tile() result, you
are probably right (I've only now looked closer at the repeat()
solution ;-). I'd still be interested in the performance - since I think
none of the reshape or rollaxis operations actually move any data
in memory (for numpy > 1.6), it might still be faster.
Cheers,
Derek
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
