On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gael Varoquaux < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 03:16:39PM -0500, Mark Wiebe wrote: > > This is why I'm also proposing to add a 'mask=' parameter to ufuncs, > for > > example, to expose the implementation details of the masked array > system > > to people who need masks but need them to be a bit different. There > may be > > other places this kind of thing would slip in as well. > > But I do not see how this is going to solve my use case, as I do not want > to keep in memory the unmasked data, for memory usage reasons. :). > That problem requires an entirely different class of sparse storage data structures, something that could be layered on top of the NumPy arrays but I think is unfortunately out of scope for this discussion. -Mark > > Gael > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
