On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Speaking as a user who's avoided numpy.ma, it wasn't actually because > of the behavior I pointed out (I never got far enough to notice it), > but because I got the distinct impression that it was a "second-class > citizen" in numpy-land. I don't know if that's true. But I wasn't sure > how solidly things like interactions between numpy and masked arrays > worked, or how and it seemed like it had more niche uses. So it just > seemed like more hassle than it was worth for my purposes. Moving it > into the core and making it really solid *would* address these > issues...
Er, that should be, "or how to write generic code that handled both ordinary and masked arrays transparently,". Man, that's the second time today I've done that. I need to proofraed better... -- Nathaniel _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
