On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 16:40, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > For Debian, we'd simply take those two separate source packages and split the > binary packages among them as appropriate.
excuse me? I don't like this solution, or are you going to do all the work in Debian to adapt to this proposal? You have a problem in ubuntu? fix it there: take the full numpy upstream tarball, rename it in numpy-doc, build only the doc, ship it where it better fits for ubuntu policies, work done & no-one gets hurt :) > A split > tarball approach from upstream would be easier to get into Debian, and thus > keep us in sync. ehm... you're speaking too fast here and without involving maintainers it seems. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
