On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 13:26, Erik Tollerud <erik.tolle...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hmm, unfortunate. So the best approach then is probably just to tell >> people to install numpy first, then my package? > > Yup. >
And really, this isn't that unreasonable. Not only does this make users more aware of their environment (ie, the distinction between your package and the major numerical package in Python), but its so much cleaner. With the combined approach, any NumPy installation problems would be (frequently) associated with your package. On the other hand, if there are any NumPy installation problems in the separated approach, at least your package is blameless. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
