On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris >> >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi All, >> >> > >> >> > David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy >> >> > math >> >> > library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how we >> >> > should >> >> > organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in >> >> > numpy/core/src? >> >> >> >> David already did this: numpy/core/src/npymath/ >> >> >> > >> > Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to >> > toss a >> > lot of real numerical code into it. >> >> Who cares? I don't. > > I care. I want the code to be organized.
Then do it when there is code and we can see what needs to be organized. >> > Maybe a subdirectory? >> >> I'm guessing YAGNI. Code first. Reorganize later, if necessary. > > Would that be Are or Aren't? I'm going for the first. "Ain't", actually. Show us the code first. Until you do, I can't imagine that there will be enough to add another layer of hierarchy to the four we already have. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
