On Feb 9, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:47, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> For some reason, numpy.lib.recfunctions isn't in the documentation >>> editor. I'm not sure why. >>> >> Because it's not in np.lib.__all__ . > > Then there needs to be a secondary way to add such modules.
All, I started porting JDH's functions from mlab to numpy.lib because I thought it'd be nice to have them directly in the core of numpy, instead of spread out in another package. However, I wanted to get a lot of feedback before advertising them: * Should we put matplotlib.mlab functions directly into numpy ? I do think so, even if I think we should make them a tad more generic and not tie them to recarrays (you can do the same thing with structured arrays without the overhead, albeit without the convenience of access-as-attributes). * If yes to the question above, how should we proceed ? John, you mind committing these functions to numpy.lib.rec_functions yourself ? If you can't, any volunteer (I can do it but it would fall low on my priority list). Once this is settle, then we could think about a way to present them in the reference and/or user manual (like I did for genfromtxt). Let me know what y'all think. P. _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
