On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:13:23AM -0700, Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Gael Varoquaux > > <[1]gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:31:45AM -0700, Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > > > I've been working on some other things lately and that number > > seemed > > > related to 2^32... now that I look more closely, I don't know > > where that > > > number comes from. > > > Is your OS 64bit? > > > Yes, Ubuntu 9.04 x86_64 > > Hum, I am wondering: could it be that Sage has not been compiled in > 64bits? That number '32' seems to me to point toward a 32bit pointer > issue (I may be wrong). The other tests I posted indicate everything else is working... For example, np.sum(fp) runs over the full set of 1e10 doubes and seems to work fine. Also, while my first thought was about 2^32, Chuck Harris's reply kinda put that to bed. Where 1410065408.0 comes from may involve e or PI (at least thats how we reverse engineered answers when I was in college :-) -glenn > > Gaël > > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > -- Glenn H. Tarbox, PhD || 206-274-6919 http://www.tarbox.org
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
