Eric Firing wrote: > > I agree. The PEP does not show overwhelming superiority (or, arguably, > even mild superiority) of any alternative
I think this PEP was poorly written. You can't see any of the advantage/differences of the different systems. Some people even said they don't see the differences with svn. I think the reason partly is that the PEP focused on existing python workflows, but the whole point, at least for me, is to change the general workflow (for reviews, code contributions, etc...). Stephen J. Turnbull sums it up nicely: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087968.html FWIW, I tend to agree that Hg is less disruptive than git when coming from svn, at least for the simple tasks (I don't know hg enough to have a really informed opinion for more advanced workflows). cheers, David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
