Charles R Harris wrote: > It isn't 0 so it should be True. Any disagreement?... Chuck NaN is not a number equal to 0, so it should be True?
NaN is not a number different from 0, so it should be False? Also see Pearu's comment. Why not raise an exception when NaN is evaluated in a boolean context? bool(NaN) has no obvious interpretation, so it should be considered an error. Sturla Molden _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
