On Nov 13, 2007 6:30 AM, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Cournapeau wrote: <snip> > I'm also interested in moving scipy.weave into numpy (without the blitz > converters which will stay in scipy). >
Hi, I'm excited to hear that weave would get "elevated" to a more exposed place ! However, I was wondering, if this fits with the idea to keep numpy minimalistic !? Does this mean that weave is "simpler" that I always thought ? [I always thought it was short of magic ;-) ] Regards, Sebastian Haase _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
