Obviously this is mainly Travis' question to answer and it depends on the nature of the reference, but I would like to see Travis's article in the recent special issue on Python for scientific use in CiSE cited as well because I think it does a great job of presenting why Python should be taken seriously as a language for scientific computing.
FWIW, Ryan On 8/29/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Travis and the Numerical Python community, > > I would like to know if there is a preferred form for citing the old > "Numeric" library and more recent "numpy" libraries in a publication. I > have checked the mailing list archives, but didn't find an answer. > > I am not aware of any publication for the original Numeric library, > leaving just the project webpage. Is something like this acceptable?: > > David Ascher et al. (2001) Numerical Python, http://www.numpy.org > > For NumPy, is it best to cite http://www.numpy.org or the book? Would > this suffice for the NumPy book citation: > > Travis E. Oliphant (2006) Guide to NumPy, Trelgol Publishing, USA. > > It would be nice to have the full citation reference details (e.g. > publisher's address and explicit year of publication) on the book's > webpage: http://www.tramy.us > > Thanks, > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
