Never mind. (Posted that before finishing the thread, sorry). DG
David Goldsmith wrote: > What is meant by "multiple nan-s"? > > DG > > mark wrote: > >> There may be multiple nan-s, but what Chris did is simply create one >> with the same nan's >> >> >> >>>>> a = N.array((1,2,3,N.nan)) >>>>> b = N.array((1,2,3,N.nan)) >>>>> >>>>> >> I think these should be the same. >> Can anybody give me a good reason why they shouldn't, because it could >> confuse a lot of people? >> >> Thanks, Mark >> >> ps. I have to admit though, that matlab does the same thing. nan==nan >> is false. >> >> On Aug 24, 4:51 am, Warren Focke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Christopher Barker wrote: >>> >>> >>>> but that feels like a kludge. maybe some sort of "TheseArrays are binary >>>> equal" would be useful. >>>> >>>> >>> But there are multiple possible NaNs, so you couldn't rely on the bits >>> comparing. >>> >>> Maybe something with masked arrays? >>> >>> w >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Numpy-discussion mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Numpy-discussion mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > > -- ERD/ORR/NOS/NOAA <http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/emergencyresponse/> _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
