Your are not generating text files - right?
On 7/24/07, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you are saying that a given tofile() call returns only after 2 seconds !? > Can you measure the getData() call time (just comment the tofile out > for a while- I that doesn't use 100% CPU ..) ? (timeit module is > needed - I think) > Maybe multithreading might help - so that tofile() and GetData() can overlap. > But 2 sec is really slow .... > > -S. > > > On 7/24/07, Lars Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > thank you for the replies. > > > > Sebastian, the chunk size is roughly 4*10^6 samples, with two byte per > > sample, this is about 8MB. I can vary this size, but increasing it only > > helps for much smaller values. For example, when I use a size of 100 > > Samples, I am much too slow. It gets better for 1000 Samples, 10000 > > Samples and so on. But since I already reached a chunksize in the region > > of megabytes, I have difficulties to increase my buffer size further. I > > also have the feeling that increasing does not help in this size region. > > (correct me if I am wrong...) > > > > Chuck, I am using a Windows XP system with a new (few months old) Maxtor > > SATA-drive. > > > > Lars > > _______________________________________________ > > Numpy-discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
