Thanks. Actually those I care the most are average and std. Is there a way to know the number of NaN in an array?
On 6/25/07, Timothy Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 6/25/07, Giorgio F. Gilestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I find myself in a situation where an array may contain not-Numbers > > that I set as NaN. > > Yet, whatever operation I do on that array( average, sum...) will > > threat the NaN as infinite values rather then ignoring them as I'd > > like it'd do. > > > Am I missing something? Is this a bug or a feature? :-) > > Neither. The best behaviour would probably be to throw an exception, but the > extra checking that would require might well slow down other stuff. > > Try looking at the following functions, they should let you do what you > want: > > 'nanargmax', 'nanargmin', 'nanmax', 'nanmin', 'nansum' > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Numpy-discussion mailing list > > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > > > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > > -- > . __ > . |-\ > . > . [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
