On Fri, 18 May 2007, Charles R Harris apparently wrote: > reST seems to be compatible with all three programs, so > that is an excellent base. What I am searching for is some > consensus as to what the documentation template should > look like.
I hope this is not too off topic. It seems that there is at least one question for Enthought here: since epydoc has the MIT license, why not work on making epydoc traits aware instead of developing endo separately? I assume that an answer to that question will provide lots of relevant information? Cheers, Alan Isaac _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
