On 4/5/07, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Why do you call it > Scipy_Projects > if it also lists people/project who use (only) numpy. > > I wish I could suggest a better name ... > I just checked the swig.org web site; the call it just > "projects" ( http://www.swig.org/projects.html ) > [ Open source projects using SWIG ] > so maybe just leaving out the "Scipy_" part. > > BTW, do peer review papers count !? I have two of them, using numpy > (originally numarray, but now it's numpy) > > Maybe the projects should be in categories: > - open source > - commercial (?) > - papers > - ?? > > -Sebastian > > > > > On 4/4/07, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/4/07, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Bill Baxter wrote: > > > > Is there any place on the Wiki that lists all the known software that > > > > uses Numpy in some way? > > > > > > >> > It would be nice to start collecting such a list if there isn't one > > > > already. Screenshots would be nice too. > > > > > > There is no such list that I know of, but you may start one on the wiki > > > if you like. > > > > Ok, I made a start: http://www.scipy.org/Scipy_Projects > > Anyone who has a project that depends on Numpy or Scipy, please go add > > your info there! > > > > I haven't linked it from anywhere, because it looks pretty pathetic > > right now with only three or four entries. But hopefully everyone > > will jumps in and add their project to the list. > > > > Part of the idea is that this should be a good place to point > > nay-sayers to when they say "meh - numpy... that's a niche project for > > a handful of scientists." > > > > So ... hopefully a good portion of the links will be things other than > > science projects. There will hopefully be a lot of things that > > "ordinary users" would care about. :-) > > > > I couldn't figure out how to add an image, but if someone knows how to > > do that, please do. > > > > --bb
Good points. I don't really have answers. So just go to town reorganizing as you feel fit. But open source / commercial is not a real dichotomy. And a paper may be written about a system that is available as open source. I tried to think of some such categories, but applications vs libs was about the best I could come up with. Probably a tagging system would be the most appropriate, but that's not so easy to make work on a Wiki. --bb _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
