> It looks like the last output value is produced by reflecting the > input and then interpolating, but presumably then the first value > should be 3.9, for consistency, not 3.1? Does that make sense?
Aargh. I think I see what's happening now. The input is supposed to be interpolated and then reflected like this: [4 3 2 1] -> [3.1 3.1 2.1 1.1 1.1] The problem is that there is still one value too many being "interpolated" here before the reflection takes place. Do the sections beginning at lines 168 & 178 need changing in a similar way to their counterparts at lines 129 & 139? I started looking into this, but I don't understand the code well enough to be sure I'm making the right changes... Thanks, James. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
