On 3/29/07, Timothy Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/29/07, Bill Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/30/07, Timothy Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Note, however that you can't (for instance) multiply column vector > with > > a row vector: > > > > >>> (c)(r) > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > ... > > TypeError: Cannot matrix multiply columns with anything > > > > That should be allowed. (N,1)*(1,M) is just an (N,M) matrix with > entries C[i,j] = A[i,0]*B[0,] I thought about that a little, and while I agree that it could be allowed, I'm not sure that it should be allowed. It's a trade off between a bit of what I would guess is little used functionality with some enhanced error checking (I would guess that usually row*column
Make that column*row. Bah. I'm off to bed. signals a mistake). However, I don't care much one way or the other; it's
not hard to allow. I kind of like the idea of using call for multiply, though. If it > doesn't turn out to have any major down sides it could be a good way > to give ndarray a concise syntax for "dot". We'll see how it goes down this time. I've proposed using call before, since I've thought the matrix situation was kind of silly for what seems like ages now, but it always sinks without a ripple. -- //=][=\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- //=][=\\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
