On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Paulo Jose da Silva e Silva apparently wrote: > Even though I can get used with using dot (or > matrixmultiply) to do it, I can easily see the benefit of > having a special operator here.
Some newer languages are taking advantage of the expressiveness of Unicode for math purposes. I believe somone on this list asked whether this might provide a way forward. Can it (taking a long view)? For example, it would be natural to use as operators the Unicode multiplication sign U+00D7 (×) and the Unicode dot operator U+22C5 (·). Cheers, Alan Isaac _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
