Travis:

yes it does. Its the Woodcrest server chip which supports 32 and 64 bit operations. For example the new Intel Fortran compiler can grab more than 2 GB of memory (its a beta10 version). I think gcc 4.x can as well.

However, Tiger (OS X 10.4.x) is not completely 64 bit compliant - Leopard is supposed to be pretty darn close.

Is there a numpy flag I could try for compilation....

Lou


On Feb 1, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:

Louis Wicker wrote:

Dear list:

I cannot seem to figure how to create arrays > 2 GB on a Mac Pro
(using Intel chip and Tiger, 4.8).  I have hand compiled both Python
2.5 and numpy 1.0.1, and cannot make arrays bigger than 2 GB.  I also
run out of space if I try and 3-6 several arrays of 1000 mb or so (the
mem-alloc failure does not seem consistent, depends on whether I am
creating them with a "numpy.ones()" call, or creating them on the fly
by doing math with the other arrays "e.g., c  = 4.3*a + 3.1*b").

Is this a numpy issue, or a Python 2.5 issue for the Mac?  I have
tried this on the SGI Altix, and this works fine.

It must be a malloc issue.  NumPy uses the system malloc to construct
arrays.  It just reports errors back to you if it can't.

I don't think the Mac Pro uses a 64-bit chip, does it?

-Travis

_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
| Dr. Louis J. Wicker
| NSSL/WRDD
| National Weather Center
| 120 David L. Boren Boulevard, Norman, OK 73072-7323
|
| E-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| HTTP:  www.nssl.noaa.gov/~lwicker
| Phone:    (405) 325-6340
| Fax:        (405) 325-6780
|
| "Programming is not just creating strings of instructions
| for a computer to execute.  It's also 'literary' in that you
| are trying to communicate a program structure to
| other humans reading the code." - Paul Rubin
|
|"Real efficiency comes from elegant solutions, not optimized programs.
| Optimization is always just a few correctness-preserving transformations
| away." - Jonathan Sobel
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
|
| "The contents  of this message are mine personally and
| do not reflect any position of  the Government or NOAA."
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----




_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to