On 1/25/07, Steve Lianoglou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Generally speaking, you need to build binaries on the lowest- > >> versioned OS X that > >> you intend to run on. > >> > > The problem with building on 10.3 is that it generally comes only with > > gcc 3.3. I remember that some things require gcc4 - right ? > > I think that might only bite you if you want to compile universal > binaries, though I'm not sure if there are any other problems w/ > gcc3.3, I'm pretty sure that's the big one. > > Of course .. that really shouldn't matter if you're just compiling it > for yourself for just that cpu. > On the contrary ! I'm trying to provide a precompiled build of numpy together with a couple a handy functions and classes that I made myself, to establish Python as a development platform in multi-dimensional image analysis.
I call it Priithon and it is build around wxPython, pyOpenG, SWIG and (of course) numpy [numarray until recently]. I have been working on this project for a couple years as part of my PhD, http://www.ucsf.edu/sedat/Priithon/PriithonHandbook.html And I'm trying to have all of Linux, Windows, OS-X (PPC) and OS-X (intel) supported. Now, I'm hoping to be able to include a version of 10.4's libmx.dyso .... that might be an acceptable workaround. Thanks, _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
